The Use of Smart and Topsis Methods in Decision Making Systems for Prioritizing Screen Printing Production

Authors

  • Jonas Franky R Panggabean Akademi Informatika dan Komputer Medicom, Medan, Indonesia
  • Leliana Harahap Akademi Informatika dan Komputer Medicom, Medan, Indonesia
  • Kamson Sirait Akademi Informatika Dan Komputer Medicom, Medan, Indonesia
  • Sutrisno Situmorang Akademi Informatika dan Komputer Medicom, Medan, Indonesia
  • Sartika Dewi Purba Akademi Informatika dan Komputer Medicom, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/jict.v15i2.181

Keywords:

Decision Making System, Production Prioritization, Screen Printing Industry, SMART, TOPSIS

Abstract

Prioritization in screen printing production is a challenge for companies to improve efficiency and product quality, especially in conditions involving various conflicting criteria. This research aims to develop a decision-making system that can optimize the prioritization of screen printing production by using the SMART method for criteria weighting and the TOPSIS method for alternative analysis. The SMART method is used to assign weights to relevant criteria, while the TOPSIS method is used to evaluate and rank alternatives based on the relative distance to positive and negative ideal solutions. The results show that alternative B has the highest ranking with a preference index value of 0.587, which reflects the optimal combination of cost, time, quality, market demand, and resources. The implication of these findings is that combining the two methods can provide more objective and measurable decisions in the management of screen printing production, but further testing is needed on a wider scale and by considering dynamic external factors. This research opens up opportunities for the development of more adaptive systems in production decision-making in the screen printing industry.

References

Alvarez, P. A., Ishizaka, A., & Martínez, L. (2021). Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115368.

Barton, M., Budjac, R., Tanuska, P., Gaspar, G., & Schreiber, P. (2022). Identification overview of industry 4.0 essential attributes and resource-limited embedded artificial-intelligence-of-things devices for small and medium-sized enterprises. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5672.

Chen, Z., Lu, M., Ming, X., Zhang, X., & Zhou, T. (2020). Explore and evaluate innovative value propositions for smart product service system: A novel graphics-based rough-fuzzy DEMATEL method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118672.

Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., De Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 119–138.

Galbreath, J. (1999). Preparing the 21st century worker: The link between computer-based technology and future skill sets. Educational Technology, 39(6), 14–22.

Guo, Y., Wang, N., Xu, Z. Y., & Wu, K. (2020). The internet of things-based decision support system for information processing in intelligent manufacturing using data mining technology. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142, 106630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106630

Islam, A. K. M. H., Sarker, M. R., Hossain, M. I., Ali, K., & Noor, K. M. A. (2021). Challenges of Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in business growth: A case of footwear industry. Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, 4(1), 119–143.

Jasim, Y. A., & Raewf, M. B. (2020). Impact of the information technology on the accounting system. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 50–57.

Mohapatra, S. (2021). Human and computer interaction in information system design for managing business. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 19(1), 1–11.

Oktavianti, E., Komala, N., & Nugrahani, F. (2019). Simple multi attribute rating technique (SMART) method on employee promotions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1193(1), 12028.

Ozturk, D., & Batuk, F. (2011). Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for spatial decision problems. Proceedings ISPRS, 1(4).

Ramón‐Canul, L. G., Margarito‐Carrizal, D. L., Limón‐Rivera, R., Morales‐Carrrera, U. A., Rodríguez‐Buenfil, I. M., Ramírez‐Sucre, M. O., Cabal‐Prieto, A., Herrera‐Corredor, J. A., & de Jesús Ramírez‐Rivera, E. (2021). Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method for the generation of external preference mapping using rapid sensometric techniques. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101(8), 3298–3307.

Soori, M., Jough, F. K. G., Dastres, R., & Arezoo, B. (2024). AI-based decision support systems in Industry 4.0, A review. Journal of Economy and Technology.

Starfield, T. (2005). Simple multi-attribute ranking technique smart. Decis. Anal.

Verma, P., Kumar, V., Daim, T., Sharma, N. K., & Mittal, A. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing impediments of industry 4.0 to sustainable digital manufacturing: A mixed method approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131639.

Zolfani, S. H., & Chatterjee, P. (2019). Comparative evaluation of sustainable design based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) methods: a perspective on household furnishing materials. Symmetry, 11(1), 74.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Panggabean, J. F. R., Harahap, L. ., Sirait, K. ., Situmorang, S. ., & Purba, S. D. . (2024). The Use of Smart and Topsis Methods in Decision Making Systems for Prioritizing Screen Printing Production. Jurnal ICT : Information and Communication Technologies, 15(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.35335/jict.v15i2.181

Most read articles by the same author(s)